Which of the following best describes a tenancy at sufferance?

A tenancy at sufferance occurs when a tenant continues to occupy a property after their lease has expired, without the landlord’s consent. This situation arises typically when a tenant has not vacated the premises by the end of the lease term. The term "sufferance" implies that while the landlord does not actively approve of the tenant’s continued presence, they also may not take immediate action to remove them. This creates a unique legal position for the tenant who is essentially remaining in the property without a current, valid lease agreement.

This situation is different from a tenant who stays with the landlord’s permission, which typically describes a valid tenancy that is either still in effect or has been extended. Additionally, a tenant with a legal right to stay indefinitely describes a more stable tenancy arrangement with an implied agreement, not a tenancy at sufferance. Similarly, a month-to-month lease indicates a flexible rental situation that is characterized by clear agreements between tenant and landlord, negating the properties of a tenancy at sufferance where the relationship has soured due to the lease's expiration. Thus, the definition of a tenancy at sufferance aligns perfectly with the situation where a tenant overstays their lease without permission.